Another email from Ernest T Spoon. - OlderMusicGeek
A wicked version of Jingle Bells backwards
Monday, October 30, 2006
Friday, October 27, 2006
Monday, October 23, 2006
HUMOR and POLITICS: A Joke
I was checking the websites at blogger.com and came across this joke from the website,
Marc Perkel Rantz. - OlderMusicGeek
What's the difference between the war in Iraq and the war in Vietnam? George W. Bush had a plan to get out of Vietnam.
Marc Perkel Rantz. - OlderMusicGeek
What's the difference between the war in Iraq and the war in Vietnam? George W. Bush had a plan to get out of Vietnam.
Sunday, October 22, 2006
HUMOR: The Donkey and the Raffle
Another email from my girlfriend, The Sassy Witch. - OlderMusicGeek
A city boy, Kenny, moved to the country and bought a donkey from an old farmer for $100.00. The farmer agreed to deliver the donkey the next day.
The next day the farmer drove up and said, "Sorry son, but I have some bad news, the donkey died."
Kenny replied, "Well then, just give me my money back."
The farmer said, "Can't do that. I went and spent it already."
Kenny said, "OK then, just unload the donkey."
The farmer asked, "What ya gonna do with him?"
Kenny, "I'm going to raffle him off."
Farmer, "You can't raffle off a dead donkey!"
Kenny, "Sure I can. Watch me. I just won't tell anybody he is dead."
A month later the farmer met up with Kenny and asked, "What happened with that dead donkey?"
Kenny, "I raffled him off. I sold 500 tickets at two dollars a piece and made a profit of $898.00."
Farmer, "Didn't anyone complain?"
Kenny, " Just the guy who won. So I gave him his two dollars back."
Kenny grew up and eventually became the chairman of Enron...
The Donkey and The Raffle
A city boy, Kenny, moved to the country and bought a donkey from an old farmer for $100.00. The farmer agreed to deliver the donkey the next day.
The next day the farmer drove up and said, "Sorry son, but I have some bad news, the donkey died."
Kenny replied, "Well then, just give me my money back."
The farmer said, "Can't do that. I went and spent it already."
Kenny said, "OK then, just unload the donkey."
The farmer asked, "What ya gonna do with him?"
Kenny, "I'm going to raffle him off."
Farmer, "You can't raffle off a dead donkey!"
Kenny, "Sure I can. Watch me. I just won't tell anybody he is dead."
A month later the farmer met up with Kenny and asked, "What happened with that dead donkey?"
Kenny, "I raffled him off. I sold 500 tickets at two dollars a piece and made a profit of $898.00."
Farmer, "Didn't anyone complain?"
Kenny, " Just the guy who won. So I gave him his two dollars back."
Kenny grew up and eventually became the chairman of Enron...
Thursday, October 19, 2006
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
HUMOR and CULTURE/SOCIETY: Like His Momma Used to Do
Another email from my girlfriend, The Sassy Witch. Once again, I hope it's not a warning! - OlderMusicGeek.
He didn't like the casserole
And he didn't like my cake.
He said my biscuits were too hard...
Not like his mother used to make.
I didn't perk the coffee right
He didn't like the stew,
I didn't mend his socks
The way his mother used to do.
I pondered for an answer
I was looking for a clue.
Then I turned around and smacked the crap out of him ...
Like his MOMMA used to do.
He didn't like the casserole
And he didn't like my cake.
He said my biscuits were too hard...
Not like his mother used to make.
I didn't perk the coffee right
He didn't like the stew,
I didn't mend his socks
The way his mother used to do.
I pondered for an answer
I was looking for a clue.
Then I turned around and smacked the crap out of him ...
Like his MOMMA used to do.
Sunday, October 15, 2006
CULTURE/SOCIETY: Which Halloween Monster are You?
Somewhere in your murky past, you were seduced to the dark side. You developed a fondness for velvet and dark fabrics, for long capes and dark red lipstick. You enjoy the evening, the shadow of the night. You tend to be sensual, and whether it's a new conquest or an old flame, a nibble on the neck is quite enticing.
Keep an eye open for the unbelieving, for those who treasure an early sunrise and have a wooden stake or two in their pockets. You never know when those bat-haters will track you down and put an end to your nocturnal pleasures!
Which Halloween Monster are You?
HUMOR: Married 43 Years
Was clearing out my old emails and came across this email The Sassy Witch sent me. - OlderMusicGeek
Subject: Married 43 years ~
Well, it's not a midlife crisis, but here's how things worked out for me. Married 43 years, took a look at my wife one day and said, "Honey, 43 years ago, we had a cheap apartment, a cheap car, slept on a sofa bed and watched a 10-inch black and white TV, but I got to sleep every night with a hot 20 year old. Now, we have a nice house, nice car, big bed and plasma screen TV, but I'm sleeping with a 56 year old woman. It seems to me that you are not holding up your side of things."
My wife is a very reasonable woman. She told me to go out and find a hot 20 year old blond to sleep with, and she would make sure that I would once again be living in a cheap apartment, driving a cheap car, sleeping on a sofa bed, and not have anything nicer than a 10-inch black and white TV ....
Subject: Married 43 years ~
Well, it's not a midlife crisis, but here's how things worked out for me. Married 43 years, took a look at my wife one day and said, "Honey, 43 years ago, we had a cheap apartment, a cheap car, slept on a sofa bed and watched a 10-inch black and white TV, but I got to sleep every night with a hot 20 year old. Now, we have a nice house, nice car, big bed and plasma screen TV, but I'm sleeping with a 56 year old woman. It seems to me that you are not holding up your side of things."
My wife is a very reasonable woman. She told me to go out and find a hot 20 year old blond to sleep with, and she would make sure that I would once again be living in a cheap apartment, driving a cheap car, sleeping on a sofa bed, and not have anything nicer than a 10-inch black and white TV ....
ENTERTAINMENT: In This Digital Music Age, The Listener is King
Here's some excerpts from an article in The Chicago Tribune that gives some hope for the future of the music industry. ("Some" being the key word.) - OlderMusicGeek
In this digital music age, the listener is king
By Greg Kot
Tribune music critic
Published October 15, 2006
MONTREAL -- For six years at its annual policy summit, the Future of Music Coalition has tried to navigate a path through uncertainty. Now, with the music industry in the midst of its most profound transition since the invention of the phonograph more than a century ago, some solutions are finally coming into focus.
The big labels continue to lose money; record sales are down for the fifth consecutive year. Commercial radio has been publicly embarrassed by payola investigations conducted by the New York State attorney general's office, in which record companies admitted that they've been paying off radio stations to play songs for decades. And retail stores are losing business; more than 1,200 closed in the last year, and last week the bankrupt Tower Records chain announced it was closing its 89 stores in 20 states and laying off 3,000 employees.
But the summit was hardly a wake. Instead, a roll-up-the-sleeves optimism prevailed, especially for artists and consumers.
"More people are experiencing music than ever before in the history of mankind," said Paul Spurgeon, general counsel for SOCAN, the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada. "The great question is how do we get paid for it?"
Panelists agreed that record companies are now at a do-or-die crossroads. Their prognosis: The labels that survive will do so by spreading sales across a wider range of talent, rather than concentrating on a handful of megasellers to ensure profitable quarterly statements to satisfy anxious shareholders. The new marketplace isn't being built for the 10-million selling act. It'll be about building a foundation for artists that sell less than 100,000 albums.
It makes sense. More than 80 percent of the music that is released in America is made by independent artists who don't sell big enough numbers to attract major-label interest. Yet a handful of corporations continue to haul in the bulk of the shrinking industry's revenue. That's because they concentrate their marketing efforts on a few dozen mega-selling artists, while more than 90 percent of the artists who record for a major label never see a penny in royalties. That business model looks particularly rickety in the Internet era.
System of sharing
A new Internet-savvy music hierarchy is being created. Commercial radio, MTV, retails stores and even record companies are losing their tastemaking status, while consumers are becoming de facto music programmers who share information and music via message boards, Web pages, e-zines and MP3 blogs.
In the process, more people than ever are making and consuming music. Without a physical product to sell, costs for recording and distributing music are sinking. At the same time, opportunities to be heard are increasing. In this world, the narrowest music tastes are being served, and a musical planet encompassing thousands of subcultures is being created.
The debate about the future of music is going back to the past
In a sense, it brought the debate about the future of music back to the past, and the oldest marketing concept of all: playing in front of an audience. It's one thing to hear an MP3 file of a new band like Montreal's Lovely Feathers, quite another to hear that band perform that same song on stage. The breathtaking intensity of the quintet's live performance at Pop Montreal made the songs on their latest album sound quaint in comparison.
"It's hard to quantify how we got noticed," said the Arcade Fire's Win Butler. "No doubt Pitchfork had an impact. But who really cares reading an article? It's the music ultimately. You listen, and you either like it or you don't. For us, we've been so much about playing live and making that connection that I don't know any other way."
"Live music," said former Talking Heads singer David Byrne, "is an experience you can't digitize."
Link to the complete article
In this digital music age, the listener is king
By Greg Kot
Tribune music critic
Published October 15, 2006
MONTREAL -- For six years at its annual policy summit, the Future of Music Coalition has tried to navigate a path through uncertainty. Now, with the music industry in the midst of its most profound transition since the invention of the phonograph more than a century ago, some solutions are finally coming into focus.
The big labels continue to lose money; record sales are down for the fifth consecutive year. Commercial radio has been publicly embarrassed by payola investigations conducted by the New York State attorney general's office, in which record companies admitted that they've been paying off radio stations to play songs for decades. And retail stores are losing business; more than 1,200 closed in the last year, and last week the bankrupt Tower Records chain announced it was closing its 89 stores in 20 states and laying off 3,000 employees.
But the summit was hardly a wake. Instead, a roll-up-the-sleeves optimism prevailed, especially for artists and consumers.
"More people are experiencing music than ever before in the history of mankind," said Paul Spurgeon, general counsel for SOCAN, the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada. "The great question is how do we get paid for it?"
Panelists agreed that record companies are now at a do-or-die crossroads. Their prognosis: The labels that survive will do so by spreading sales across a wider range of talent, rather than concentrating on a handful of megasellers to ensure profitable quarterly statements to satisfy anxious shareholders. The new marketplace isn't being built for the 10-million selling act. It'll be about building a foundation for artists that sell less than 100,000 albums.
It makes sense. More than 80 percent of the music that is released in America is made by independent artists who don't sell big enough numbers to attract major-label interest. Yet a handful of corporations continue to haul in the bulk of the shrinking industry's revenue. That's because they concentrate their marketing efforts on a few dozen mega-selling artists, while more than 90 percent of the artists who record for a major label never see a penny in royalties. That business model looks particularly rickety in the Internet era.
System of sharing
A new Internet-savvy music hierarchy is being created. Commercial radio, MTV, retails stores and even record companies are losing their tastemaking status, while consumers are becoming de facto music programmers who share information and music via message boards, Web pages, e-zines and MP3 blogs.
In the process, more people than ever are making and consuming music. Without a physical product to sell, costs for recording and distributing music are sinking. At the same time, opportunities to be heard are increasing. In this world, the narrowest music tastes are being served, and a musical planet encompassing thousands of subcultures is being created.
The debate about the future of music is going back to the past
In a sense, it brought the debate about the future of music back to the past, and the oldest marketing concept of all: playing in front of an audience. It's one thing to hear an MP3 file of a new band like Montreal's Lovely Feathers, quite another to hear that band perform that same song on stage. The breathtaking intensity of the quintet's live performance at Pop Montreal made the songs on their latest album sound quaint in comparison.
"It's hard to quantify how we got noticed," said the Arcade Fire's Win Butler. "No doubt Pitchfork had an impact. But who really cares reading an article? It's the music ultimately. You listen, and you either like it or you don't. For us, we've been so much about playing live and making that connection that I don't know any other way."
"Live music," said former Talking Heads singer David Byrne, "is an experience you can't digitize."
Link to the complete article
Saturday, October 14, 2006
ENTERTAINMENT: Cool Pic
Found this pic at Digital Traveler at http://digitalartphotographyfordummies.blogspot.com/and I thought I'd share it.
Friday, October 13, 2006
ENTERTAINMENT: Which Horror Killer Are You?
Seeing as it's Halloween time, I thought I'd give the results of this test Sassy Witch's daughter sent me.
Which Horror Killer are You?
Which Horror Killer are You?
You scored as Hannibal Lecter. You are Hannibal Lecter. You dont need to eat human flesh to live, but do so because it just taste good. You are very intelligent, and enjoy using it to your advantage to keep people guessing. You arent a killing machine, but when you do decide to let loose, watch out! Dinner is served, with some fava beans, and a nice chianti!
created with QuizFarm.com |
Thursday, October 12, 2006
ENTERTAINMENT: A Couple of Bizarre Audiofiles
I found these at a site for awards on Australian radio when I was looking for something else, but they're too good not to share.
Surreal FM
The Dangers of Toenail Clippings
Surreal FM
The Dangers of Toenail Clippings
Sunday, October 08, 2006
CULTURE/SOCIETY and SCIENCE: Results to a Personality Test
This is the result of a test from Similiarminds.com that compares your feelings on various personal things to the ways others answered.
statement | %male | %female |
| I am embarrassed to have people see my home. | 92% | 91% |
| All the problems I have had in life have been my fault. | 82% | 86% |
| I act without planning. | 80% | 82% |
| I am not easily annoyed. | 77% | 85% |
| I absolutely do not want to be average. | 76% | 79% |
| I don't respect people with strong ties to organizations, groups, or even family. | 74% | 86% |
| I think marijuana should be legalized. | 73% | 80% |
| I expect people that care about me to be very accommodating to my sensitive feelings. | 73% | 64% |
| I focus on what's missing in my life or me. | 72% | 74% |
| Fun is the most important thing in life. | 69% | 76% |
| People have trouble reading me and that's fine with me. | 68% | 76% |
| I am always in the same mood. | 68% | 81% |
| I am very adventurous. | 68% | 75% |
| I am easily intimidated. | 67% | 60% |
| I am always joking. | 65% | 71% |
| I am a large-sized person. | 65% | 70% |
| I choose friends whose loyalty I can predict. | 63% | 62% |
| I think emotions can pollute objectivity. | 61% | 70% |
| I act quickly without thinking. | 57% | 54% |
| I don't follow the rules. | 55% | 64% |
| I am very good at saving money. | 54% | 57% |
| I am socially awkward. | 52% | 58% |
| I don't like when things don't make sense. | 51% | 49% |
| I am more attentive than physical or cerebral. | 48% | 44% |
| I feel the need to adhere to the standards of correct behavior. | 48% | 48% |
| I am not always honest with myself. | 46% | 39% |
| My thoughtfulness and charitable nature are my foundation. | 46% | 36% |
| I do not understand the world enough. | 44% | 38% |
| I am frequently helping others but I forget about myself. | 43% | 37% |
| I am good at getting people to have fun. | 41% | 36% |
| I think people would not like me if they really knew me. | 39% | 37% |
| I act at the expense of others. | 38% | 42% |
| I like to look weird. | 37% | 42% |
| I am easily confused. | 37% | 28% |
| I am a creature of habit. | 36% | 37% |
| I have a lot of energy. | 35% | 35% |
| I am defensive. | 35% | 33% |
| My life is defined by loneliness. | 35% | 42% |
| It hurts to see people who have what I want. | 33% | 33% |
| I am easily influenced. | 30% | 27% |
| People sometimes don't appreciate all the work I do for them. | 29% | 29% |
| I go after what I want. | 24% | 24% |
| I frequently make fun of people. | 23% | 31% |
| I don't like happy people. | 20% | 23% |
| I am devoted to religion. | 20% | 18% |
| I am demanding. | 18% | 18% |
| I am often late to work. | 16% | 16% |
| I am easily frightened. | 11% | 6% |
| I am strongly influenced by the good moods of others. | 7% | 3% |
| I wish I was better looking. | 2% | 2% |
Saturday, October 07, 2006
ENTERTAINMENT: A Bizarre Video Using Albums Covers
My much younger brother, Harmonica 23, once again sent something hilarious that I have to pass unto you.
WARNING: It makes much use of blood!
A bizarre video using albums covers
WARNING: It makes much use of blood!
A bizarre video using albums covers
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
ENTERTAINMENT and CULTURE/SOCIETY: Which Horror Movie Character Are You?
My brother, Harmonica 23 , sent me this result he got from a internet quiz.
I found it pretty amusing, and decided to try it for myself...
I can't say I approve of the comment on the mentally challenged. But unfortunately, I suppose there might be a bit of truth in the description, though I'm not exactly sure how much. But the description was funny enough that I'm glad I did it.
If you want to try it, click on the link below. The links in the picture just take you to the website, but not the quiz.
Which Horror Movie Character Are You?
Please feel free to put your results in the comments. I would love to see some other descriptions.
I found it pretty amusing, and decided to try it for myself...
I can't say I approve of the comment on the mentally challenged. But unfortunately, I suppose there might be a bit of truth in the description, though I'm not exactly sure how much. But the description was funny enough that I'm glad I did it.
If you want to try it, click on the link below. The links in the picture just take you to the website, but not the quiz.
Which Horror Movie Character Are You?
Please feel free to put your results in the comments. I would love to see some other descriptions.
Sunday, October 01, 2006
ENTERTAINMENT and CULTURE/SOCIETY: Which Superhero Are You?
Your results:
You are Spider-Man
Click here to take the "Which Superhero are you?" quiz...
I have to admit that I was surprised by this result. I was expecting Superman. Who is also rather geeky, but always striving to do the right thing.
But now that I think about, I suppose I am more like Peter Parker than like Clark Kent...
You are Spider-Man
| You are intelligent, witty, a bit geeky and have great power and responsibility.  |
Click here to take the "Which Superhero are you?" quiz...
I have to admit that I was surprised by this result. I was expecting Superman. Who is also rather geeky, but always striving to do the right thing.
But now that I think about, I suppose I am more like Peter Parker than like Clark Kent...